The Media and Their Part in Human Rights Protection


The criminal matter of Oscar Pistorius is no secret. The justification behind the hype is that he is a celebrity. Every day, for the past four days, little tid-bits of interpretations and rarely facts were hogging the headlines of this matter.


Meanwhile, a six year old girl was raped today by a fellow student at her school in Western Cape. In addition to this, a woman was gang-raped by a group of men, some of whom have been arrested.


Compared to the headlines stolen by the Pistorius case, who would want to hear about South Africa’s most tragic flaw? Who is being failed here?

  1. The justice system – the media can play a crucial role in societal awareness.
  2. Its people – who better to propagate a crime-preventative society than its people?
  3. The victims – being outgunned by the same system which was built to protect them is not justified.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can the Hague Convention help me see my child?

The ever-present problem of child abduction persists in many countries. “Abductions” has a wide meaning in terms of Child Law to include keeping a child away in another country from a parent who has rights to see his/her child. South Africa became a signatory to the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction on 1 October 1997 (“the Convention”). Prior to the Convention, even if a parent had a court-ordered right to a child, it was exceptionally difficult to enforce that right outside of the Country which granted the order, being it of ‘access’ or ‘custody.’ The major limitation with respect to the Convention is that it is only applicable to countries who are signatories to it and whom therefore have an obligation to ratify the Convention into its own law. These countries are called “Contracting States.” This means that each country that agreed to abide by the Convention must create its own ‘local’ laws to give effect to the Convention, so that their o...
Read more

Breather for Creditors; Beware for Debtors

Commercial debtors and creditors (veteran and inexperienced) are generally aware of the Golden Rule when it comes to debt collection. It is a very old yet deadly rule; it would appear, however, that creditors and debtors alike appear to have limited understanding of this rule in the practical sphere. The Golden Rule : As a general rule, Section 11(d) of the Prescription Act, 68 of 1969 declares that if a debt is owed by person A ( the debtor ) to person B ( the creditor ), and unless person A is a State entity, person B is granted a period of three years from due date to claim the debt from person A in a Court of competent jurisdiction before the debt shall be deemed to have become legally extinguished. It is essential that creditors and debtors alike are aware of this Rule. For the creditor, it indicates the time allowed to enforce its rights to claim the said amount from the debtor. For the Debtor, it indicates whether or not there is a valid defence against a debt wh...
Read more

The End to Peeping Toms

Since 5 December 2011, the Protection from Harassment Act, 2011 (“the Act”) has been tested throughout South African Magisterial Courts within the civil context. Apart from some fine-tuned housekeeping by these Courts, the orders emanating from this Act have some far-reaching consequences. Regardless, it has seen to the end of the archaic Peace Orders which, in practice, served very little (if any) purpose in the way of protecting victims of harassment, civil abuse, and intimidation. How does one know if conduct to which he/she is being subjected would fall under the protection offered by the Act? Essentially, the Act authorises the Courts to conduct two enquiries into each application: is there harassment , and if the answer to this question is in the affirmative, does the harassment cause harm ? As it is with all spheres of law, the answers to these questions are far from simple. Section 1 of the Act defines both “Harassment” and “harm”. Harassment has been attributed ...
Read more